Challenge the work. Every submission is logged.
This site is built to be challenged line by line. If a number is wrong, a citation is off, a quotation is misread, or a building is misrepresented — write. Every submission is logged with timestamp. Substantive corrections result in an updated page and a revision note.
How to use it
The feedback channel is for: factual corrections to any number, citation, or quotation on this site; disputes about methodology; identification of missing sources or recent literature; reports of broken links; requests for clarification; institutional responses to documents that name the institution; and general comment on the work.
It is not for: marketing solicitations; advocacy submissions from organisations unrelated to the work; or content additions to any of the published documents. Substantive content updates to the Codex and companion papers happen through their own revision process.
The form is being installed
The interactive submission form for this site is being installed. In the interim, please send feedback by email to the address below. Email submissions are processed identically to form submissions: logged with timestamp, reviewed, and where substantive, acted on with a revision note posted on the relevant page.
Email: feedback (at) fullboundarycarbon (dot) org
Please identify yourself in your submission. Anonymous submissions are logged and reviewed but cannot be acknowledged with a response.
The chain of notice
Every submission is logged with timestamp, originating institution where identified, and the document or page to which it pertains. This log is itself part of the public record this site keeps. Three things follow from a submission:
- Acknowledgement. Where identification is provided, an acknowledgement is sent confirming receipt and the date of logging.
- Review. Substantive submissions — corrections to numbers, citations, quotations, or factual claims — are reviewed against the source documents. If the submission is correct, the page is updated and a revision note is posted on the same page indicating what changed, when, and on whose submission.
- Institutional responses. Where an institution named in a document submits a response or request, the submission is logged in full and the institution's response is, on the institution's preference, either kept in the private log or published on the relevant page alongside the original assertion.
The log is durable. It does not get deleted, edited, or selectively published. This is the working method of every audit document.
If you are a named institution
If your institution is named on any page of this site and you would like to respond, please do so through this channel. Three options are available to you:
- Submit a correction if any fact attributed to your institution is wrong. Provide the source you believe is correct. The correction is reviewed against both sources and, where the submitted source supersedes ours, the page is updated.
- Submit a response if you accept the facts as stated but wish to add context, clarification, or a response of your own. Responses are published on the relevant page below the original assertion, with attribution, at your preference.
- Submit a notice if you believe a statement on this site is legally defective. Notices are reviewed promptly. Where the statement is found to require revision, the page is updated within five business days. Where the notice does not require revision, the notice itself is logged and the page remains as published.
The intent of this channel is to make sure that any institution named here has a clean working path to respond. The work on this site is offered openly for review, citation, replication, and disputation.